Ross, Cody T., Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Seung-Yun Oh, Samuel Bowles, Bret Beheim, John Bunce, . “Modification in order to: ‘Greater riches inequality, smaller polygyny: rethinking the newest polygyny threshold model’.” Log of Royal Society user interface 15 (147): 20180752.
Sellen, Daniel W., and Daniel J. Hruschka. 2004. “Extracted-food money-security polygyny during the local west united states Communities at get in touch with.” Current anthropology 45 (5): 707–14. Silas, Ellis. 1926. A prehistoric Arcadia. London: T. Fisher Unwin Ltd. Spencer, Herbert. 1876. Principles off Sociology: Vol. 1. London: Appleton.
Starkweather, Katherine Elizabeth., and you may Raymond Hames. 2012. “A survey regarding Low-Traditional Polyandry.” Human nature 23 (2): 149–72. Textor, Robert B. 1967. A corner-Social Conclusion. The fresh new Retreat, CT: HRAF Drive.
White, Douglas Roentgen., and you can Michael L. Burton. 1988. “Factors behind Polygyny: Ecology, Discount, Kinship, and you can Warfare.” American anthropologist ninety (4): 871–87.
Whiting, John W. Meters. 1964. “Outcomes of climate to your certain cultural strategies.” From inside the Explorations during the Cultural Anthropology: Essays in honor of George Peter Murdock, edited by the Ward See Goodenough, 511–forty-two. New york, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Whiting, John W. Meters., and you can Beatrice B. Whiting. 1975. “Aloofness and you will Closeness from Husbands and you can Spouses: A corner-Cultural Investigation.” Ethos step three (2): 183–207.
- The rates are from the fresh new Ethnographic Atlas Murdock (1962–1971) because the recovered of when you look at the D-Place.org (Kirby et al. 2016) ??
- These types of figures derive from data throughout the Simple Get across Social Attempt that happen to be coded by the Broude and you will Greene (1985) ; such study for the matrimony was in fact recovered from D-Put changeable SCCS739. Of one’s 148 societies about Basic Cross Social Take to and that Broude and you can Green coded 30.1% have complete individual choices, 17.6% has personal alternatives that requires parental acceptance, step 3.4% features individual possibilities that can require parental plan, 18.2% provides both individual choices otherwise establish relationship, 16.9% keeps developed wedding, but individuals have the capacity to target, and you can a dozen.8% provides totally arranged matrimony.??
- New rates inside paragraph and in the brand new Contour try built into study on Simple Cross-Social Test (Murdock and you can Light 1969) ; these types of analysis with the polygyny were recovered from D-Place adjustable SCCS211. The quality Get across-Cultural Test (SCCS) is an example of 185 societies. Rates on the SCCS as well as advised new included cake chart lower than.??
- There are only dos polyandrous communities about SCCS.??
- Of the numerous type of polygyny, minimal are most typical, accompanied by nonsororal polygyny, then sororal polygyny.??
- A corner-types study of animals and you https://kissbrides.com/de/mumbai-frauen/ may birds Yards. Ember and you can Ember (1979) found that an excess of females including forecast polygynous instead of monogamous connection. Specific research has not discover assistance into sex proportion idea, but steps regarding polygyny had been additional (Hooper 2006; Quinlan and you may Quinlan 2007) otherwise varying was imputed (Minocher, Duda, and you will Jaeggi 2019) .??
From the Individual Connections Town Documents
Person Interactions City Data files, Inc. ( HRAF ) are an internationally approved organization in the area of social anthropology. Its objective is always to remind and support the latest cross-social examination of individual people, community and you may conclusion prior to now and provide.
EHRAF Databases
- eHRAF Globe Societies
- eHRAF Archaeology
Contact HRAF
- Tel: 203-764-9401
The usual means to fix decide to try theories will be to evaluate societies having and rather than a traditional characteristic to see if the brand new version is forecast of the variation in a thought causal basis. When you’re such as examination can not be presented in the place of version to review, decisions in other animal varieties will get shed light on these types of ideas. Needless to say, we can’t speak about matrimony various other variety, but we could evaluate types with stability during the men-women mating and you can compare these with variety without having people balance.
Various other cultures, personal recognition out of wedding is based on a successful trial period. The latest Guarani regarding South usa habit demo relationships, in which authoritative matrimony procedure are deferred up until after the possible bridegroom demonstrates his viability for wedding. Schaden and you can Lewinsohn (1962) confides in us one to
Community exogamy/endogamy
Of several anthropological accounts declaration envy certainly co-wives. ) discover in approximately 90% of your own societies with co-spouses, ethnographers declaration sexual and you can emotional dispute and additionally they stop one to conflict is far more-or-less an excellent common for the polygynous societies. Polygynous societies appear to have responded to envy with specific well-known traditions and legislation that include: which have independent home and kitchen areas to own nonsororal co-wives, that have regulations throughout the husbands discussing info equitably, and having regulations for resting with co-spouses during the rotation (C. R. Ember, Ember, and you can Peregrine 2019, 245) . Provided significant envy, particular anthropologists notice it puzzling that polygyny is really common (elizabeth.g., Meters. Ember (1974) ).
Are there architectural items which will help us make up varying breakup prices? While some search supporting the theory one societies which have matrilocal residence be open-minded regarding separation and divorce (Minturn, Grosse, and you will Haider 1969) , other browse cannot select the relationships instance strong whenever almost every other activities are controlled (Ackerman 1963; Pearson and you can Hendrix 1979) . Ackerman (1963) means that the amount that a wife was a part of a good society’s descent framework is more predictive. Instance incorporation is just before age area, otherwise it does occur immediately after relationships, particularly being cared for from the an excellent ily. Ackerman (1963) discovers one to
Goody, Jack. 1973. “Bridewealth and you may Dowry within the Africa and Eurasia.” Within the Bridewealth and you may Dowry, edited from the Jack Goody and you may S. J. Tambiah, 1–58. Cambridge Documentation in Societal Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Force.