The new questionnaire contained step three pieces. Region I integrated inquiries of socio-demographic study (many years, amount of knowledge, parity, familial money, job, latest relationship reputation, sexual craft, reputation of HPV vaccination, and you will history of unpredictable cervical malignant tumors examination).
Region II made up of six questions about the goal women that can be processed, decades first off, frequency, many years otherwise standards to prevent out-of evaluating, and techniques of evaluation. Only the people who’d have you ever heard regarding HPV perform go ahead so you can Area III and therefore analyzed knowledge about HPV regarding its variety of (oncogenic otherwise low-oncogenic), means of transmission and you may protection.
Before the data, the new questionnaire out-of region II and part III mГёde Japansk kvinder for the Thai version was in fact considered, chatted about, and you may changed until consensus among 20 researchers have been every gynecologic oncologists (some was indeed article authors various other synchronous studies). The professionals rated each of 19 issues once the possibly ‘relevant’ or ‘not relevant’. The object-level Blogs Authenticity Directory (I-CVI) is actually determined for each product, and Articles Validity Index (CVI) is determined by using the average proportion out of fourteen questions regarding information about cervical cancers assessment and you can 5 questions about HPV. The latest CVI had been 1 for components of the brand new survey (S1 Desk). This new accuracy are checked out into the 30 feminine with the exact same trait because professionals. The Cronbach’ leader coefficients to the precision were 0.819 to own knowledge about cervical cancers tests and 0.907 for understanding of HPV.
Research collection
Toward time away from planned colposcopy, the analysis assistant given guidance of your own study towards women exactly who met introduction requirements. The women whom wanted to participate offered created informed consent and you may answered the survey independently by themselves just before continuing in order to colposcopy.
Data collected for this research have been socio-group data (Region We of survey), experience in cervical cancers evaluating (Area II), and you will experience in HPV (Region III).
Analytical data
The latest solutions of knowledge in the cervical cancer tumors assessment and HPV was basically examined by the for every items prior to scoring categorization. Best answer try scored once the step 1 while ‘incorrect and being unsure of answer’ was scored 0.
Away from 14 inquiries away from cervical cancer examination, feminine whoever score had been ? 10 had been randomly categorized as the that have ‘an effective knowledge’ normally was in fact thought to be that have “not-good degree”. Getting knowledge of HPV, feminine whose respond to was ‘never heard of HPV’ was in fact excluded regarding investigation regarding HPV studies.
Out-of 5 questions, women whose rating were ? 3 were regarded as which have ‘a good experience with HPV’ usually as ‘bad knowledge’. Regarding 19 questions, female whoever score was indeed ? thirteen was categorized as the with ‘an effective complete knowledge’ otherwise given that ‘negative full knowledge’.
All of the investigation was in fact obtained from inside the an electronic databases and you may assessed having fun with SPSS V.26.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive analytics were used to analyze group research and you can was described since wide variety which have percentage, mean which have standard departure otherwise median with range. This new association between for every single adjustable and studies rating was indeed examined playing with easy linear regression. Exploratory model was developed into the multivariable analysis along with all the details possibly associated with the details get. The fresh thought quantity of analytical importance is a great p-property value 0.05 or faster.
Abilities
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>